A further remark inspired by Gidi's text

Hi guys, this post is initially a reaction to Gidis question but the sucus counts for everybody. Just one thing ahead: I write with a literary perspective, but don't be put off by the terms, you can apply them to illustrations without any greater problems. So here you go, to Gidi: It depends very much on the perspective with your work. For me, the illustrations all have a distinct position, a „voice“ as I would say in literary terms. That is of course a very good thing, as standard positions can be found anywhere and far too often. Nobody needs repetitious art – its your very own distinctive view that counts, and its exactly this view that can lead to readers accquiring new positions – its a simple process really. But the problem with a distinct singular voice is of course that it has to be brought forward in a clear manner. And thats where I think you could definitely improve your approach. State your position loud and clear and as well as possible. The last part is the most important of course. If you have a distinct style that differs from others you have to put a lot more work and discipline into phrasing it well, into making it untouchable. It has to be difficult to find fault in your work – the illustration has to make us think „I don't know what the hell this is or where it came from – but we love it!“
Is this helpful? Hm. At least it has to be clear that you actually want people to see what you're doing because you actually have something to say!
Johannes.